Art vs. Pornography: What’s the Difference? Where to draw the line?
In the world of art and pornography, there’s a fine line that often meets or intertwines. In part, it has to do with how both are seen. It is the same manner by which the saying “Beauty is in the eye of the beholder” is understood. What may be regarded as ugly for one person, can end up being aesthetically pleasing for another. This of course, is nothing new since people have been voicing their opinions on art for centuries. Drawings and sculptures from long ago, caused many to call them sexually explicit content at the time. Others felt it was art and as such, the artists were allowed to get away with it.
While it may not mean much now, think of the uproar nude statues or paintings stirred up back then. Yet today, most people have no qualms with nude statues or art projects that feature similar imagery. Not only that, they go a step further and praise it as fine art. However, when you show those same individuals’ pornography from magazines or movies, they do not feel the same. According to them, they are construed as porn since they are more sexually explicit in nature. This is where the debate gets intense and people begin taking sides.
Some argue that there are scads of erotic and sexually graphic drawings in paintings. For instance, in the rim of an Attic red-figure kylix, images of people engaged in orgies are visible. This particular piece predates 510 BC. Another shows heterosexual couples in bed or drawn images of men with large penises. Not only are not these considered vulgar by many in high society, they are also worth a lot of money. In fact, people are willing to pay millions of dollars for these objects of fine art.
Taft Florida 32824 USA
1 800 468 6388